Did Read More › phillip-e-johnson-sather-tower Type post Author Stephen C. Weikart patiently highlights some key evidence to the contrary, statements front and center in Hitler’s writing. The new book paints Darwin follower Herbert Spencer as the eugenics-championing bad guy and posits that Darwin and Darwinism had little or no influence on Hitler’s warped master race ethic. Weikart, author of Hitler’s Ethic, From Darwin to Hitler, Hitler’s Religion, and The Death of Humanity,* says that a major shortcoming of the new book is the authors’ attempt to put as much distance as possible between Darwin and eugenics thinking, and between Darwin and Hitler.
In today’s ID the Future historian Richard Weikart (Cal State Stanislaus) dissects a new Cambridge University Press book on social Darwinism by Jeffrey O’Connell and Michael Ruse. Wilson, Ernst Haeckel, Eugenics, From Darwin to Hitler, Herbert Spencer, Hitler’s Ethic, Hitler’s Religion, Jeffrey O’Connell, Michael Ruse, Pantheism, racism, Richard Weikart, Social Darwinism, struggle for life, struggle for survival, survival of the fittest, The Death of Humanity, World War I, World War II Richard Weikart Reviews New Book on Social Darwinism Richard Weikart ApEthicsĭownload file | Play in new window | Duration: 00:17:03 | Recorded on April 28, 2021 skulls.jpg Type post Author Richard Weikart Date ApCategorized Ethics Tagged Adolf Hitler, Cambridge University Press, Charles Darwin, colonialism, E.O. This interview is presented here with permission of philosopher and YouTuber Pat Flynn. The focus is Meyer’s new book, Return of the God Hypothesis, and here in the second and final part of their conversation, Flynn and Meyer discuss the beginning of the universe, the multiverse hypothesis, worldview bias, Bayesian probability calculus, methodological materialism, and specific scientific predictions that intelligent design thinking has motivated. Meyer, director of Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture. On this ID the Future, Pat Flynn continues his conversation with bestselling author and philosopher of science Stephen C. Meyer JIntelligent Designĭownload file | Play in new window | Duration: 00:26:08 | Recorded on June 21, 2021 Meyer Date JCategorized Intelligent Design Tagged Alvin Plantinga, anthropic coincidences, Atheism, Bayesian probability calculus,, epistemology, evolutionary theory, fine tuning, Fred Hoyle, Intelligent Design, John Polkinghorne, metaphysics, Michael Ruse, multiverse, Naturalism, New Atheists, origins science, Return of the God Hypothesis, Richard Dawkins, Theism, Tim McGrew, universe-generating machine Pat Flynn, Stephen Meyer, and the Return of the God Hypothesis, Pt. He says this is doubly problematic because (a) scientists Read More › RGH cover no text Type post Author Stephen C. Luskin critiques the first two and argues that the dialogue view, in practice, quickly devolves into a monologue where religion is supposed to sit down and shut up the moment there is a point of difference between religion and consensus science.
Luskin, associate director of Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture, summarizes the three views covered in the book: the independence view presented by Michael Ruse, the dialogue view presented by Alister McGrath, and the constrained integration view presented by Bruce Gordon. On today’s ID the Future, host Tom Gilson and guest Casey Luskin discuss a new book Luskin recently reviewed at Evolution News, Three Views on Christianity and Science.
Download file | Play in new window | Duration: 00:25:47 | Recorded on June 28, 2021